Two (Totally Opposite) Ways to Save the Planet (Ep. 346 Rebroadcast)

拯救地球的两种(完全相反)方法(Ep. 346转播)

Freakonomics Radio

社会与文化

2021-07-29

53 分钟
PDF

单集简介 ...

The environmentalists say we’re doomed if we don’t drastically reduce consumption. The technologists say that human ingenuity can solve just about any problem. A debate that’s been around for decades has become a shouting match. Is anyone right?
更多

单集文稿 ...

  • Hey there.

  • Steven Dubner.

  • Hope you're enjoying the summer so far.

  • We are.

  • So much so that we are reaching into the archive this week to play you an episode we first published in the summer of 2018.

  • With all the extreme weather events going on this summer around the world, floods and drought fueled wildfires especially, we thought this one might be worth another listen.

  • It is called two totally opposite ways to save the planet.

  • Hope you enjoy.

  • At one point, I was going to call the book Toblerone for 10 billion.

  • That was vetoed by my editor for some reason.

  • Charles C.

  • Mann is a journalist who writes big books about the history of science.

  • His current interest is the modern environmental movement.

  • The modern environmental movement, which I would argue is the only successful ideology to emerge from the 20th century.

  • By the middle of the 21st century, the global population is expected to reach 10 billion.

  • And the question is, are we going to be be able to satisfy all their demands for food, water, energy?

  • Also Toblerone, because in addition to food and water and the basics, they're going to want occasional treats.

  • And there's one more big concern.

  • How are we going to deal with climate change?

  • Those are the big challenges.