This is philosophy bites with me, Nigel.
Warburton and me, David Edmonds.
Philosophy Bytes is unfunded.
Please help us keep it going by subscribing or donating at www.philosophybytes.com or you can become a patron at Patreon.
The philosophy of history concerns questions such as what counts as historical evidence, or whether history can be said to progress.
The polymath Theodore Zeldin is interested in philosophy and history, but not in the usual way.
He thinks we should be having a conversation with the past.
Theodore Zeldin, welcome to philosophy Bites.
Thank you.
The topic we're going to focus on is philosophy and history.
That's an interesting combination.
What have you got to say about the relationship between philosophy and history?
History is the account of human experience, of all human experience.
And philosophy is the attempt to make sense out of that and to discover, at least for me, what is a full life, what is worth doing, and using the experience of the past not to obtain lessons from it, but to obtain a provocation of the imagination, to see what has been tried out, why it has failed, what new ideas might come out of it, what relationships one can create which were not created in the past, what one can do now which one hasn't done in the past.
That's really interesting, because philosophy is often characterized as almost anachronistic, that it presents itself as contemporary logical debate about problems that matter.
Yes, the basis with which I start is that we are all in our heads an antique shop.
We're full of bric a brac coming from every century, and we have all sorts of ideas and all sorts of habits.
And to think of ourselves as being just living in our own time, is a mistake.
We combine in ourselves both a tendency to obedience, to following certain rules, to imitation, to thinking that we can be like other people.
And the bit that interests me is discovery.