This is philosophy bites with me, Nigel.
Warburton and me, David Edmonds.
Philosophy Bites is unfunded.
Please help us keep it going by subscribing or donating at www.philosophybytes.com or you can become a patron at Patreon.
We haven't had to do this before on philosophy bites, but this is a warning.
If you're offended by swear words, stop this podcast right now, for it contains the f word, the p word, the a word, the t word, the w word, and several more besides.
You know what I mean when I use the phrase the f word.
Is that phrase any less offensive than using the full word?
You know, the f u c k word?
Normally clean mouthed Rebecca Roach has been thinking about the philosophy of swearing.
Rebecca wrote, welcome to philosophy bites.
Thank you very much.
The topic we're going to talk about is swearing.
So I think we need to get clear at the beginning what we mean by swearing.
So swearing is the use of taboo language.
It's generally taken to perform a function where it expresses emotion.
Rather than that it's used specifically to denote something, although it can be used like that.
I think you better give some examples.
So words like fuck, cunt, wank, shit, ass, tits, prick.
You've given sexual and scatological ones, but they're also words which are considered blasphemous, which also fit the category of swearing.