Andrew Levin and Christina Parajon Skinner on *Central Bank Undersight: Assessing the Fed’s Accountability to Congress*

安德鲁·莱文 (Andrew Levin) 和克里斯蒂娜·帕拉洪·斯金纳 (Christina Parajon Skinner) 谈*央行洞察:评估美联储对国会的责任*

Macro Musings with David Beckworth

教育

2024-03-25

54 分钟
PDF

单集简介 ...

Andy Levin is a professor of economics at Dartmouth University and a former senior staffer at the Federal Reserve Board of Governors. Christina Parajon Skinner is a legal scholar at the University of Pennsylvania and formerly was legal counsel to the Bank of England. Andy and Christina have co-authored a new article titled, *Central Bank Undersight: Assessing the Fed’s Accountability to Congress,* and they rejoin David on Macro Musings to talk about it. Specifically, they discuss the Fed’s power under a constitutional authority, the three sources of Fed undersight, proposals for reform, and more.   Transcript for this week’s episode.   Andrew’s Twitter: @andrewtlevin Andrew’s Dartmouth profile   Christina’s Twitter: @CParaSkinner Christina’s UPenn profile   David Beckworth’s Twitter: @DavidBeckworth Follow us on Twitter: @Macro_Musings   Join the Macro Musings mailing list! Check out our Macro Musings merch!   Related Links:   *Central Bank Undersight: Assessing the Fed’s Accountability to Congress* by Andrew Levin and Christina Parajon Skinner   *Andrew Levin on the Costs and Benefits of QE4 and the Future of the Fed’s Balance Sheet* by Macro Musings
更多

单集文稿 ...

  • Welcome to Macro musings, where each week we pull back the curtain and take a closer look at the most important macroeconomic issues of the past, present and future.

  • I am your host, David Beckworth, a senior research fellow with the Mercator center at George Mason University.

  • And I'm glad you decided to join us.

  • Our guests today are Andrew Levin and Christina Parajohn Skinner.

  • Andy is a professor of economics at Dartmouth University and a former senior staffer at the Federal Reserve Board of governors.

  • Christina is a legal scholar at the University of Pennsylvania and formerly was a legal counsel to the bank of England.

  • Andy and Christina have co authored a new article titled Central Bank Undersight, assessing the Fed's accountability to Congress, and they join us today to discuss this paper.

  • Welcome back, Andy and Christina.

  • Thanks for having us.

  • David.

  • Well, this was a very interesting article to read, and some might call it provocative because in the very title it says central bank undersight as opposed to oversight, which is what you guys are getting at.

  • So I'm curious to hear the motivation for this very, for some provocative paper.

  • Yes.

  • Well, I guess you can say that with our title, we're certainly not bearing the lead, are we?

  • Right.

  • So, you know, I think it's really helpful probably for the listeners to start out with very big picture, and then we can talk about our respective motivations for coming together and collaborating on this project.

  • Big picture.

  • The question that we're trying to get at here is whether Congress's oversight tools, capacity, attention are really fit for purpose for overseeing a modern Fed, a central bank.

  • That's really changed a lot in the past 15 years.

  • Is Congress still thinking about Fed oversight like it did in the nineties or in the early odds?