BBC Sounds Music Radio Podcasts this is.
In our time from BBC Radio 4 and this is one of more than a thousand episodes you can find on BBC Sounds and on our website.
If you scroll down the page for this edition, you find a reading list to go with it.
I hope you enjoy the program.
Hello.
In the Road to Serfdom, published in 1944, the economist Friedrich Hayek warned that the way Britain ran its wartime economy would not work in peacetime and could lead to tyranny.
His target was centralized planning.
Arguing this disempowered individuals and wasted their knowledge while empowering those ill suited to run an economy.
And when the Reader's Digest selectively condensed Hayek's book in 1945 and presented it not so much as a warning against tyranny, but as proof against socialism, it became phenomenally influential around the world.
With me to discuss Friedrich Hayek's the Road to Serfdom are Bruce Caldwell, research Professor of Economics at Duke University and Director of the center for the History of Political Economy, Ben Jackson, professor of Modern History and fellow, University College at the University of Oxford, and Melissa Lane, the class of 1943 professor of politics at Princeton University and the 50th professor of rhetoric at Gresham College in London.
Melissa Hayek was Austrian by birth.
What was his background there?
So Hayek was born in 1899 into the Austro Hungarian Empire, born in Vienna, and we might borrow a phrase from George Orwell and say that he was born into the lower upper middle class, if we can transplant that to the class structure of the empire.
And we might emphasize three aspects of his upbringing and early life.
One was science.
So his father was a physician who was also a passionate botanist.
And so Hayek developed a taste for the good of science and also a sense of what science should not be.
The second thing we might highlight is liberalism.
So he fought in the First World War and then studying at the University of Vienna, he was active in a student party supporting the Bourgeois Democratic Party, which was effectively a liberal party.
But he inclined a bit more towards social democracy then than he would later on.