Should offensive species names be changed? The organisms that honour dictators, racists and criminals

Categorizing things is central to science. And there are dozens of systems scientists have created to name everything from the trenches on the sea bed to the stars in the sky. But names have consequences — unintended or otherwise. In our new series What’s in a name we’ll explore naming in science and how names impact the world — whether that’s how the names of storms impact public safety, how the names of diseases impact patient care, or even how the names of scientific concepts can drive the direction of research itself. In this first episode we’re looking at species names. The modern system of species naming began in the 1700s and has played a vital role in standardizing academic communication, ensuring that scientists are on the same page when they talk about an organism. However, this system is not without its issues. For example, there has been much debate around whether species with names considered offensive — such as those named after historical racists — should be changed, and what rule changes need to be made to allow this to happen. We speak to researchers about the history of this naming system, how it’s applied and how it might evolve in the face of growing pressures. Sources For a full list of sources, please visit https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-04200-9 Music credits Premiumaudio/Pond5 Alon Marcus/Pond5 Groove Committee/Pond5 Opcono/Pond5 Erik Mcnerny/Pond5 Earless Pierre/Pond5 Richard Smithson/Triple Scoop Music/Getty Images ​​​​​​​Douglas Romayne/Triple Scoop Music/Getty Images Sound effects via Pond5 Thick-billed Longspur/​​​​​​​Andrew Spencer via ​​​​​​​CC BY-NC-ND 2.5 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.