Why States Took a Gamble on Sports Betting

为什么各州冒险开放体育博彩?

Good on Paper

新闻

2025-01-28

54 分钟
PDF

单集简介 ...

Seven years after the Supreme Court struck down a ban on state-sanctioned sports betting, a more complete picture of the downstream effects of legalization is starting to emerge. As some states see debt delinquency and problem gambling increase, the journalist Danny Funt explains why lawmakers took a gamble on sports betting in the first place.  Get more from your favorite Atlantic voices when you subscribe. You’ll enjoy unlimited access to Pulitzer-winning journalism, from clear-eyed analysis and insight on breaking news to fascinating explorations of our world. Subscribe today at TheAtlantic.com/podsub. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
更多

单集文稿 ...

  • The super bowl is coming up.

  • And so today we're talking about the most important part of sports gambling.

  • In 2018,

  • the Supreme Court struck down a federal ban

  • on sports betting that spurred four years of non stop ads,

  • enticing me and you

  • and everyone I know to spend all of our discretionary income on FanDuel or DraftKings.

  • At the time,

  • advocates believed

  • that the revenue streams that could come from sports betting were too good to pass up.

  • After the Great Recession, states were cash strapped and hungry for new sources of money.

  • States have unevenly legalized, meaning in some places you can log onto your phone and place a bet,

  • but in others, you might still need to go to a physical location.

  • The court left open other pathways for the federal government to curb or ban sports betting.

  • And.

  • And as many of the negative impacts of gambling have metastasized,

  • more policymakers are questioning whether legalization is worth the revenue.

  • My name is Jerusalem Dempsis.

  • I'm a staff writer at the Atlantic.

  • And this is good on paper,