What’s wrong with effective altruism? With Martin Sandbu

什么是有效利他主义的错?与马丁·桑德布对话

The Economics Show

新闻

2024-10-14

30 分钟
PDF

单集简介 ...

The effective altruism movement has been on a wild ride over the past decade. EA started – in the popular consciousness, at least – as a forum for mindful questions about where best to put charitable dollars. Think bed nets and de-worming pills. But, since then, EA seems to have devolved into rationalisations for making tons of money, freak-outs about AI and the end of humanity. Today, on the show, Soumaya and guest Martin Sandbu, the FT economics editorial writer, discuss EA’s evolution, its future and whether it even makes any sense. Soumaya Keynes writes a column each week for the Financial Times. You can find it here Subscribe to Soumaya's show on Apple, Spotify, Pocket Casts or wherever you listen. Read a transcript of this episode on FT.com Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
更多

单集文稿 ...

  • The effective altruism movement has been on a wild ride.

  • Now.

  • When I first engaged with it in the early 2010s,

  • it seemed to be about how to give money to charity more effectively, how to do the most good.

  • And that meant more money for things like anti malaria bed nets or deworming pills,

  • things like that.

  • But since then, effective altruism has evolved.

  • It became about crazy and sometimes uncomfortable thought experiments.

  • It became about the risk of AI wiping us out.

  • It started shaping academic research agendas.

  • It became the darling of Silicon Valley Tech Bros.

  • Everything got a bit intense and arguably it went a bit wrong.

  • Today we are going to talk about effective altruism.

  • Does it make sense?

  • This is the Economics Show.

  • I'm Samaya Keynes in London, joined in the studio by Martin Sandboo,

  • my colleague here at the Financial Times.

  • Hi, Martin.

  • Hi.

  • Are you an effective altruist?