2025-03-28
32 分钟Hello, everyone.
I'm Stephen West.
This is Philosophize This.
So this hears a philosophical companion for reading the book The Plague by Albert Camus.
Heads up, this episode builds off the one we just did before this on his book The Stranger.
So maybe listen to that one before you do this one.
That said, coming into this episode, we already know a couple important things about Camus so far in this series.
We know that Camus thought of himself as an artist and not a philosopher, that he didn't want to be a philosopher,
that philosophers in his eyes are people that build systems out of theoretical abstractions and
that he thinks abstract argument not only misses something deeply important about the human condition,
but that it sets a dangerous precedent for people to live their lives believing
that philosophy can somehow provide some neat justification for things that go on in the world,
but that this is all nonsense for Camus at some level.
This is just philosophical suicide.
So what we see instead in his work is him not being someone who wrote philosophical works,
where he might write out propositions and then try to organize them into a system in a more classic way philosophers have done things.
Camus is much more interested in his work in presenting what he calls images of the human condition.
His thinking is that by dramatizing these ideas and creating images,
there won't be so much of a temptation for people to try to reduce them into some kind of delusional system of universals.
As Camus himself once said, what is a novel, but just a philosophy expressed in images?